In Re: Estate Of Dalacas

CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 2022
Docket83702
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Estate Of Dalacas (In Re: Estate Of Dalacas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Estate Of Dalacas, (Neb. 2022).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF No. 83702 DEMETRIOS A. DALACAS, DECEASED.

RYAN MCCLARAN, FILED Appellant, JAN 2 8 2022 vs. ELL2A8ETH A. BROWN ESTATE OF DEMETRIOS A. DALACAS; CLERK4FIPPREME COURT BY AND JASEN E. CASSADY, DEPUTYaCI.El < r Res e ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order appointing a special administrator and from special letters of administration. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Veronica Barisich, Judge. Appellant filed a notice of appeal from "the Order Affirming Report and Recommendation Appointing Jasen Cassady as Special Administrator entered in this case on September 21, 2021, with Notice of Entry being filed September 22, 2021, and the Letters of Special Administration filed on September 27, 2021." Appellant then filed a "motion for determination of standing to appear asking this court to determine whether it has jurisdiction over the appeal because the two applicable statutes appear to conflict. Specifically, NRS 140.020(3)(b) expressly provides that no appeal may be taken from an order appointing a special administrator, while NRS 155.190(1)(a) provides expressly that an order issuing or revoking letters of administration is an appealable order. On December 17, 2021, this court entered an order explaining that the appeal may not be taken from the order appointing a special administrator, but

.1 on that the statute permits a challenge by appeal to letters of administration. See NRS 155.190(1)(a). The parties now seek clarification, concurring that the appeal challenges special letters of administration. This court held in Nevada Paving, Inc. v. Callahan, 83 Nev. 208, 427 P.2d 383 (1967), that NRS 155.190 anticipates an appeal from general letters of administration, and that NRS 140.020 precludes an appeal from special letters of administration. Id. At 210-11, 427 P.2d at 384. As both parties concede that at issue in this matter are special letters of administration, which this court held are not independently appealable, this court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

, J. Silver

GOA) , J. Cadish Pickering

cc: Hon. Veronica Barisich, District Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Breeden & Associates, PLLC Lipson Neilson P.C. Blackrock Legal, LLC Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1947A 411641s> 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nevada Paving, Inc. v. Callahan
427 P.2d 383 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Estate Of Dalacas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-dalacas-nev-2022.