In Re Estate of Blaine

1925 OK 282, 235 P. 534, 108 Okla. 180, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 127
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedApril 7, 1925
Docket15250
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1925 OK 282 (In Re Estate of Blaine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Estate of Blaine, 1925 OK 282, 235 P. 534, 108 Okla. 180, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 127 (Okla. 1925).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

.This case a.rose in the county court of Osage county, and from an order made in that court, defendant appealed to the district court. In the district cour1'-defendant, who is plaintiff in error in this court, moved the court to dismiss the appeal. This motion was overruled and plaintiff in error excepted. Plaintiff in error filed motion for a new trial, which was overruled, to which plaintiff in error excepted and gave notice of appeal.

An order made by the district court overruling a motion to dismiss an appeal from the county court is not an appealable order. In re Cochran’s Estate, 48 Okla. 672, 149 Pac. 1089.

*181 A motion for new trial was not necessary. Powell et al. v. Nichols et al., 26 Okla. 735, 110 Pac. 762.

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sokolosky v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.
1946 OK 143 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)
Brandon v. Permutit Co.
1925 OK 657 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1925 OK 282, 235 P. 534, 108 Okla. 180, 1925 Okla. LEXIS 127, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-blaine-okla-1925.