In re Estate of Billings

1 P. 701, 64 Cal. 427, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 379
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 4, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by38 cases

This text of 1 P. 701 (In re Estate of Billings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Estate of Billings, 1 P. 701, 64 Cal. 427, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 379 (Cal. 1884).

Opinion

Myrick, J.

The body of the script proposed as an olographic will was entirely written and was signed by the hand of the deceased. The date reads thus “ Sacramento, April 1st, 1880.” The words “ April 1st” were written by the deceased, the balance was printed, the deceased having, evidently, taken a sheet of paper with a letter-head, stating the business and location of his firm, the name of the place “Sacramento,” and the year “1880,” printed, and filled in the month and day, “April 1st.”

We had occasion to consider the principle underlying the facts of this case, in Estate of Martin, 58 Cal. 530, and Estate of Rand, 61 Cal. 468. Section 1277, Civil Code, requires that a paper, to constitute an olographic will, must been tirely Avritten, dated, and signed by the hand of the testator. It must be entirely Avritten, it must be entirely dated, and it must be entirely signed by him. If it be partly written by him and partly Avritten by another, or printed; if it be partly dated or signed by him and partly by another, it is not a compliance Avith the statute. The Avords “April 1st” do not constitute a date—do not show on what April 1st the paper was written—there being, as was suggested on the argument, many days “ April 1st,” in the life of any man; it was requisite that the whole date, April 1, 1880, should have been written by him in order to comply with the statute.

Order affirmed.

[428]*428Sharpstein, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.

Hearing in Bank denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Will of Ferree
848 A.2d 81 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2003)
Estate of Black
641 P.2d 754 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
Bouch v. Rombotis
641 P.2d 754 (California Supreme Court, 1982)
Estate of Hazelwood
249 Cal. App. 2d 263 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Jacobson v. Kristovich
249 Cal. App. 2d 263 (California Court of Appeal, 1967)
Lundblade v. Avery
344 P.2d 612 (California Court of Appeal, 1959)
Morford v. Elliott
1958 OK 97 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
In Re Bennett's Estate
1958 OK 97 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1958)
Treaster v. Hamlin
295 P.2d 898 (California Court of Appeal, 1956)
Estate of Fritz
227 P.2d 539 (California Court of Appeal, 1951)
In Re Irvine's Estate
139 P.2d 489 (Montana Supreme Court, 1943)
Wild v. Hall
139 P.2d 489 (Montana Supreme Court, 1943)
Estate of Goldsworthy
129 P.2d 949 (California Court of Appeal, 1942)
Estate of Durlewanger
107 P.2d 477 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Irving v. Scripps Memorial Hospital
93 P.2d 555 (California Supreme Court, 1939)
Estate of Maguire
58 P.2d 209 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Montague v. Street
231 N.W. 728 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1930)
In Re Yowell's Estate
285 P. 285 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)
Yowell v. Ogden State Bank
285 P. 285 (Utah Supreme Court, 1930)
De Caccia v. Barrington
273 P. 552 (California Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 P. 701, 64 Cal. 427, 1884 Cal. LEXIS 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-billings-cal-1884.