In re Estate of Beverson
47 Cal. 621
Opinion
We agree with the Court below, that on the facts disclosed by the bill of exceptions the connection between Tilly Beverson and the deceased was meretricious, and that there was no proof whatever of any marriage between them.
Order affirmed—remittitur forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re Estate of Beverson, 47 Cal. 621 (Cal. 1874).
47 Cal. 621 (In re Estate of Beverson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Estate of Maher
68 N.E. 159 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1903)
Maher v. Maher
56 N.E. 124 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
McKenna v. McKenna
54 N.E. 641 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1899)
McKenna v. McKenna
73 Ill. App. 64 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1898)
In re Estate of James
3 Coffey 130 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1897)
Cartwright v. McGown
12 N.E. 737 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1887)
Bussom v. Forsyth
32 N.J. Eq. 277 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1880)