In Re Estate of Betsey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

In Re Estate of Betsey

1923 OK 362, 215 P. 1053, 90 Okla. 82, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1114

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 12, 1923

DocketNo. 11489

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 362 (In Re Estate of Betsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Estate of Betsey, 1923 OK 362, 215 P. 1053, 90 Okla. 82, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1114 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, commenced this action in the district court of Muskogee county against the defendants in error, defendants below, by the filing of a transcript on appeal from the county court of said county. The district court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, from which plaintiffs appealed. On April 24, 1923, the appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. Thereafter plaintiffs in error filed a motion to vacate the order of dismissal and for time in which to file briefs. On May 8, 1923, the order dismissing the appeal was vacated and ten days given from that date in which to file briefs. No briefs were filed in the time allowed and no reason given for failure so to do. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, HARRISON, and MASON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, commenced this action in the district court of Muskogee county against the defendants in error, defendants below, by the filing of a transcript on appeal from the county court of said county. The district court rendered judgment in favor of defendants, from which plaintiffs appealed. On April 24, 1923, the appeal was dismissed by this court for want of prosecution. Thereafter plaintiffs in error filed a motion to vacate the order of dismissal and for time in which to file briefs. On May 8, 1923, the order dismissing the appeal was vacated and ten days given from that date in which to file briefs. No briefs were filed in the time allowed and no reason given for failure so to do. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

NICHOLSON, COCHRAN, HARRISON, and MASON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 362, 215 P. 1053, 90 Okla. 82, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 1114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-estate-of-betsey-okla-1923.