In re: Escprecion

Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2025·No. SCPW-25-0000387·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 30-SEP-2025 02:39 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________

IN RE ROSY SOTTO ESCPRECION ________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC161001976)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed April 30, 2025, and the record, an extraordinary writ is unwarranted because the relief that Petitioner seeks will be considered through the normal appellate process. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 30, 2025. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re: Escprecion, (haw 2025).

In re: Escprecion (In re: Escprecion) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Womble Bond Dickinson v. Kim
537 P.3d 1154 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2023)