In re: Escprecion
This text of In re: Escprecion (In re: Escprecion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX 30-SEP-2025 02:39 PM Dkt. 4 ODDP
SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI ________________________________________________________________
IN RE ROSY SOTTO ESCPRECION ________________________________________________________________
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CASE NO. 1CC161001976)
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS (By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus filed April 30, 2025, and the record, an extraordinary writ is unwarranted because the relief that Petitioner seeks will be considered through the normal appellate process. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023). It is ordered that the petition is denied. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, September 30, 2025. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Todd W. Eddins /s/ Lisa M. Ginoza /s/ Vladimir P. Devens
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re: Escprecion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-escprecion-haw-2025.