In Re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury

192 A. 256, 326 Pa. 260, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 464
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 21, 1937
DocketAppeal, 164
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 192 A. 256 (In Re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of United States Treasury, 192 A. 256, 326 Pa. 260, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 464 (Pa. 1937).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The previous history of this deposit is set forth in In re Escheat of Moneys in Custody of U. S. Treasury, 322 Pa. 481. We there held that the court below had jurisdiction to decide under State laws the ownership of the fund and the record was remanded to determine whether or not the money was escheated.

This appeal restates the arguments of the United States against the jurisdiction of the court below. Since no new matter is presented, we affirm so much of the decree of the court as follows:

“Whereas, in the matter of Alice Frances Brown et al. v. Pennsylvania Canal Company et al., No. 677 in equity, of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, moneys in the amount of $16,874.49 were paid into the Registry of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on January 22,1919, and

“Whereas, thereafter, on June 26, 1936, these moneys were deposited to the credit of the Treasury of the United States, subject to the order of the Court from which the said moneys were received, to wit, the aforementioned United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, under the provisions of the Act of Congress of March 3, 1911, C. 224, Revised Statutes 996; 36 Statutes 1083, 28 United States Code 852, and

“Whereas, the original owners of the said moneys have been unknown for a space of seven years and more, the said sum of $16,874.49 is hereby declared escheated to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, and Philip Klein, Escheator, duly appointed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to prosecute the claim of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to these moneys

Decree as stated affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Murdoch v. Pennsylvania Railroad
19 Pa. D. & C.2d 573 (Dauphin County Court of Common Pleas, 1958)
State v. Gallaher
129 A.2d 593 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
United States v. Board of Finance and Revenue
85 A.2d 156 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1951)
Philadelphia Electric Company Case
43 A.2d 116 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1945)
In re Escheat of Funds Under Control of Federal District Court
42 Pa. D. & C. 418 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1941)
Rosenfeld's Appeal
10 A.2d 570 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
United States v. Klein
106 F.2d 213 (Third Circuit, 1939)
United States v. Klein
303 U.S. 276 (Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
192 A. 256, 326 Pa. 260, 1937 Pa. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-escheat-of-moneys-in-custody-of-united-states-treasury-pa-1937.