In re E.S.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re E.S.

2012 Ohio 5911, 984 N.E.2d 1056, 135 Ohio St. 3d 135

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 18, 2012·No. 2012-0782·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re Bruce S., 134 Ohio St.3d 477, 2012-Ohio-5696, 983 N.E.2d 350.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Kennedy, J., not participating. *136 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sheryl Trzaska, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee, E.S.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re Bruce S., 134 Ohio St.3d 477, 2012-Ohio-5696, 983 N.E.2d 350.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Kennedy, J., not participating. *136 Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Sheryl Trzaska, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee, E.S.

In re E.S., 2012 Ohio 5911, 984 N.E.2d 1056, 135 Ohio St. 3d 135 (Ohio 2012).

Pincite

2012 Ohio 5911 (In re E.S.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related