in Re Erskin Harris
This text of in Re Erskin Harris (in Re Erskin Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2007.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-07-00231-CV
In Re ERSKIN HARRIS, Relator
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
WRIT OF MANDAMUS
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
On April 5, 2007, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. ' 22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator asks this court to compel the Honorable Jeannine Barr, presiding judge of the 182nd District Court of Harris County, to rule on relator=s motion for DNA testing of evidence pursuant to Chapter 64 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
Relator has not established that he is entitled to mandamus relief. There is no indication in the record that the motion was ever set for submission or that any other action was taken to alert the trial court to the filed motion and that, once so alerted, the trial court refused to rule. See Barnes v. State, 832 S.W.2d 424 (Tex. App.CHouston [1st Dist.] 1992, no pet.); In re Hughes, 2004 WL 89289 (Tex. App.CAmarillo 2004) (orig. proceeding). Accordingly, we deny relator=s petition for writ of mandamus.
PER CURIAM
Petition Denied and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15, 2007.
Panel consists of Justices Yates, Anderson and Hudson.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Erskin Harris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-erskin-harris-texapp-2007.