In Re Ernesto Medina v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Ernesto Medina v. the State of Texas (In Re Ernesto Medina v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-23-00646-CR
IN RE Ernesto MEDINA
Original Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 19, 2023
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On July 3, 2023, Relator Ernesto Medina filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator is
represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v.
State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation
means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s
review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.]
1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017-CR-4038, styled State of Texas v. Ernesto Medina, pending in the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Ron Rangel presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Ernesto Medina v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ernesto-medina-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.