In Re Ernesto Cordero v. the State of Texas
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
SUBSTITUTE MEMORANDUM OPINION
No. 04-24-00393-CV
IN RE Ernesto CORDERO, Relator
Original Proceeding 1
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Irene Rios, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Delivered and Filed: April 16, 2025
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On September 11, 2024, we issued a memorandum opinion denying relator Ernesto
Cordero’s petition for writ of mandamus. Relator has since moved for rehearing. We grant relator’s
motion for rehearing. After reconsidering his petition for mandamus, we withdraw our
memorandum opinion of September 11, 2024, and issue this substitute memorandum opinion.
On June 7, 2024, relator filed his petition for writ of mandamus. In the petition, relator asks
this court to determine whether the trial court properly exercised its jurisdiction and to order the
presiding judge of the 45th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, Texas to vacate its orders,
including the “Emergency Temporary Ex Parte Protective Order and Order Setting Hearing,” in
the underlying cause.
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2023-CI-26915, styled In the Matter of the Marriage of Lori Fine and Ernesto Cordero and In the Interest of V.F., a child, pending in the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Vasquez-Hortick presiding. 04-25-00063-CV
After considering the petition and the record, this court concludes relator has not
demonstrated that he is entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of
mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re Ernesto Cordero v. the State of Texas (In Re Ernesto Cordero v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.