In Re: Ernesto Castillo v. the State of Texas
Opinion
DENY and Opinion Filed March 28, 2023
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-23-00055-CV
IN RE ERNESTO CASTILLO, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-17721
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Reichek, Nowell, and Miskel Opinion by Justice Miskel In his January 19, 2023 petition for writ of mandamus, relator asks us to vacate
the trial court’s contempt order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.
Entitlement to mandamus relief generally requires relator to demonstrate that the
trial court clearly abused its discretion and that he lacks an adequate remedy by
appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig.
proceeding).
After reviewing the petition and the record before us, we conclude that relator
has failed to show that the trial court abused its discretion. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Emily Miskel/ EMILY MISKEL JUSTICE
230055F.P05
–2–
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In Re: Ernesto Castillo v. the State of Texas (In Re: Ernesto Castillo v. the State of Texas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.