in Re: Ernesto Castillo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 19, 2022
Docket05-22-01317-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Ernesto Castillo (in Re: Ernesto Castillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Ernesto Castillo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Order entered December 19, 2022

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-22-01317-CV

IN RE ERNESTO CASTILLO, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-17-17721

ORDER Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle

Before the Court is relator’s December 12, 2022 petition for writ of

mandamus. Relator’s petition does not comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure.

First, based on our review, the appendix attached to relator’s petition

contains unredacted sensitive information, including financial account numbers

and a minor’s name, birthdate, and address in violation of Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 9.9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9.

Second, although relator included a properly authenticated transcript of the

testimony adduced at an August 4, 2022 hearing, the transcript does not include the exhibits offered into evidence. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7(a)(2). Further, although

relator included sworn or certified copies of some documents included in his

appendix, many of the documents included in relator’s appendix are not properly

sworn or certified copies. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k), 52.7(a); see also In re

Butler, 270 S.W.3d 757, 758 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding).

Accordingly, we STRIKE relator’s petition and appendix and GRANT

relator leave to re-file a petition and appendix or record that complies with the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before December 22, 2022. We

CAUTION relator that failure to re-file the petition and appendix as permitted by

this order may result in the dismissal of this cause without further notice.

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Butler
270 S.W.3d 757 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Ernesto Castillo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ernesto-castillo-texapp-2022.