in Re Ernest Ray Koonce

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00440-CV Style: In re Ernest Ray Koonce, Relator Date motion filed*: November 19, 2015 Type of motion: Opposed First Motion for Extension of Time to File Response Parties filing motion: Real Party in Interest Wells Fargo Document to be filed: Response to Supplemental Mandamus Petition

Is appeal accelerated? Yes (original proceeding).

If motion to extend time: Original due date: November 23, 2015 Number of extensions granted: 0 Current Due Date: November 23, 2015 Date Requested: December 7, 2015

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ Because the Real Party in Interest timely filed its response to the supplemental petition on November 23, 2015, its extension request is dismissed as moot. Pursuant to the Court’s November 3, 2015 Order, relator’s reply, combined with any response to Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss in No. 01-15-00228-CV, if any, must be filed within 20 days of Wells Fargo’s response, or by December 14, 2015, but this Court may decide the case before a reply is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2, 38.6(c), 52.5.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes 

Date: November 25, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision