in Re Ernest Patrick Lewallen

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 14, 2011
Docket11-11-00172-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Ernest Patrick Lewallen (in Re Ernest Patrick Lewallen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Ernest Patrick Lewallen, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

Opinion filed July 14, 2011

                                                                       In The

  Eleventh Court of Appeals

                                                                   __________

                                                         No. 11-11-00172-CR

                            IN RE ERNEST PATRICK LEWALLEN

                                              Original Proceeding

                                            M E M O R A N D U M   O P I N I O N

Relator, Ernest Patrick Lewallen, seeks release from his confinement in the Taylor County Jail. He complains that the trial court has refused to release him on a personal recognizance bond pending trial despite his proven indigence.  Relator has designated his request for relief as an “Application for Writ of Mandamus.”  However, it is the substance of a document that governs, not the title.  Ex parte Caldwell, 58 S.W.3d 127, 130 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000). Relator is, in effect, seeking pretrial habeas relief.  Therefore, we construe the filed document as an application for a pretrial writ of habeas corpus.

Courts of appeals do not have original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal law matters. Dodson v. State, 988 S.W.2d 833, 835 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1999, no pet.); Ex parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1994, no pet.). In such matters, their jurisdiction is appellate only. Dodson, 988 S.W.2d at 835.  Because relator seeks habeas relief in an original proceeding, we are without jurisdiction to consider his application.

Accordingly, we dismiss the application for want of jurisdiction.

                                                                                                PER CURIAM

July 14, 2011

Do not publish.  See Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Panel[1] consists of:  Wright, C.J.,

McCall, J., and Hill, J.[2]



[1]Rick Strange, Justice, resigned effective April 17, 2011.  The justice position is vacant pending appointment of a successor by the governor.

[2]John G. Hill, Former Justice, Court of Appeals, 2nd District of Texas at Fort Worth, sitting by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Caldwell
58 S.W.3d 127 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Ex Parte Hawkins
885 S.W.2d 586 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994)
Dodson v. State
988 S.W.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Ernest Patrick Lewallen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ernest-patrick-lewallen-texapp-2011.