In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital

70 A.D.2d 800, 417 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12331

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 5, 1979

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 70 A.D.2d 800 (In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Erik Vaughn D. New York Foundling Hospital, 70 A.D.2d 800, 417 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12331 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinions

— Order, Family Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1978, suspending for one year the making of a final order of disposition based on the court’s finding that the subject child is permanently neglected, affirmed, and the matter remanded to Family Court to make the appropriate order of disposition, without costs. The suspension, based upon articulated doubts as to the best interests of the child in relation to his natural mother, was within the authority of the court (Family Ct Act, § 631, subd [b]; § 633). That order has, within recent days, expired by its terms and should be replaced forthwith by a dispositional order granting the relief requested in the petition, based on the findings and for the reasons stated in the very order appealed from. Concur —Bloom, Markewich, Yesawich and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Family Court, New York County, entered April 25, 1978, suspending for one year the making of a final order of disposition based on the court’s finding that the subject child is permanently neglected, affirmed, and the matter remanded to Family Court to make the appropriate order of disposition, without costs. The suspension, based upon articulated doubts as to the best interests of the child in relation to his natural mother, was within the authority of the court (Family Ct Act, § 631, subd [b]; § 633). That order has, within recent days, expired by its terms and should be replaced forthwith by a dispositional order granting the relief requested in the petition, based on the findings and for the reasons stated in the very order appealed from. Concur —Bloom, Markewich, Yesawich and Ross, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 A.D.2d 800, 417 N.Y.S.2d 863, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-erik-vaughn-d-new-york-foundling-hospital-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack