in Re Erik Ramos II
Opinion
NUMBER 13-22-00497-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
IN RE ERIK RAMOS II
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
ORDER
Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Order Per Curiam
Relator Erik Ramos II has filed a petition for writ of mandamus contending that the
trial court violated relator’s right to due process under the United States Constitution and
right to due course of law under the Texas Constitution by: (1) revoking relator’s bond
without proper notice, (2) revoking relator’s bond without benefit of a hearing; and (3) by
refusing to allow relator’s counsel to present evidence or make an offer of proof.
The Court requests that the real party in interest, the State of Texas, acting by and
through Jose Aliseda, the Bee County District Attorney, or any others whose interest
would be directly affected by the relief sought, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus on or before the expiration of ten days from the date of this order. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 52.2, 52.4, 52.8.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 21st day of October, 2022.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Erik Ramos II (in Re Erik Ramos II) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.