in Re Erick Andika

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Erick Andika

DecidedNovember 12, 2013

Docket02-13-00391-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Erick Andika (in Re Erick Andika) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Erick Andika, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00391-CV

IN RE ERICK ANDIKA RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

The court has considered relator’s “Petition For Writ of Mandamus to

Correct an Illegal Sentence” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2

Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 Our denial of mandamus relief does not preclude relator from seeking relief on his claim of an illegal sentence through a properly-raised article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2013); see also Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“We have long held that a claim of an illegal sentence is cognizable on a writ of habeas corpus.”). DELIVERED: November 12, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI