in Re Erick Andika
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00391-CV
IN RE ERICK ANDIKA RELATOR
------------
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
The court has considered relator’s “Petition For Writ of Mandamus to
Correct an Illegal Sentence” and is of the opinion that relief should be denied.2
Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: WALKER, DAUPHINOT, and MCCOY, JJ.
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8(d). 2 Our denial of mandamus relief does not preclude relator from seeking relief on his claim of an illegal sentence through a properly-raised article 11.07 writ of habeas corpus. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07 (West Supp. 2013); see also Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“We have long held that a claim of an illegal sentence is cognizable on a writ of habeas corpus.”). DELIVERED: November 12, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re Erick Andika (in Re Erick Andika) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.