In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas
This text of In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas (In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-25-00377-CV __________________
IN RE ERIC SPRINGSTUN
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 457th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas Trial Cause No. 25-09-15036 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eric Springstun filed a petition for a writ of mandamus (and he filed a motion
for temporary relief), seeking to compel the local administrative judge to rule on
Springstun’s Chapter 11 vexatious litigant request for permission to file a notice of
appeal in Trial Cause Number 25-09-15036. On October 13, 2025, Springstun
notified this Court that his mandamus proceeding is moot because the local
administrative judge signed an order granting him permission to appeal.1 We dismiss
1 The appeal has been docketed in the appellate court as Appeal Number 09- 25-00318-CV, Eric Springstun v. City of League City, Eric Cox, Donato Angelo De Pinto, and The Wharf at Clear Lake Maintenance Association, Inc. 1 the mandamus proceeding and the motion for temporary relief without reference to
the merits.
PETITION DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on October 22, 2025 Opinion Delivered October 23, 2025
Before Golemon, C.J., Johnson and Wright, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re Eric Springstun v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-springstun-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.