in Re Eric Ricardo Torres

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 11, 2008·No. 04-08-00349-CR·Published

Opinion

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice Rebecca Simmons, Justice

Delivered and filed: June 11, 2008

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

On May 21, 2008, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus asking this court to order

respondent to set aside his 1993 judgment of conviction on the grounds that the sentence was “illegal

and unauthorized” because his sentence exceeds the statutory maximum.

Although the courts of appeals have mandamus jurisdiction in criminal matters, only the

Texas Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction over matters related to final post-conviction felony

proceedings. See Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals, 802 S.W.2d 241, 243 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991)

(orig. proceeding); In re McAfee, 53 S.W.3d 715, 717 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, orig.

1

… This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 3039, styled State of Texas v. Eric Ricardo Torres, filed in the 216th Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas.

Do not publish

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Eric Ricardo Torres, (Tex. Ct. App. 2008).

in Re Eric Ricardo Torres (in Re Eric Ricardo Torres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ater v. Eighth Court of Appeals
802 S.W.2d 241 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1991)
In Re McAfee
53 S.W.3d 715 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)