in Re Eric Linton
This text of in Re Eric Linton (in Re Eric Linton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this mandamus proceeding, Eric Linton seeks to compel the trial court to vacate its order denying Linton's pre-trial petition for writ of habeas corpus, filed as Writ No. 2132. The pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus seeks to have the prosecution in Cause No. 95154 dismissed with prejudice for "false probable cause, illegally obtained evidence, police misconduct, and ineffective counsel." Linton primarily complains that the trial court denied his petition without conducting an evidentiary hearing. Linton has not demonstrated that his claims are cognizable in a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus. See Ex parte Culver, 932 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex. App.--El Paso 1996, pet. ref'd). "[A] pretrial writ application is not appropriate when resolution of the question presented, even if resolved in favor of the applicant, would not result in immediate release." Ex parte Weise, 55 S.W.3d 617, 619 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001). The relator has not shown that the trial court had a mandatory duty to conduct an evidentiary hearing. The petition for writ of mandamus is denied.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Opinion Delivered August 30, 2007
Before McKeithen, C.J., Gaultney and Horton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eric Linton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-linton-texapp-2007.