in Re Eric Jorell Mathis
This text of in Re Eric Jorell Mathis (in Re Eric Jorell Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-22-00401-CR __________________
IN RE ERIC JORELL MATHIS
__________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 258th District Court of Polk County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. CR21-0380 and CR22-0158 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Eric Jorell Mathis seeks to compel the
trial court to dismiss two indictments with prejudice. We deny mandamus relief.
Mathis says that on July 26, 2022, he mailed a pro se application for a writ of
habeas corpus seeking bail reduction and a pro se motion to dismiss he sent to the
district clerk. Mathis complains that the trial court judge refused to read the motions
when Mathis brought the motions to the attention of the trial court in a hearing on
October 6, 2022. The scheduling orders Mathis attached to the mandamus record
indicate that Mathis was represented by counsel on that date and that the trial court
set the cases for trial beginning December 5, 2022. Criminal defendants are generally
1 not entitled to hybrid representation and a “trial court is free to disregard any pro se
motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel.” Robinson v. State,
240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).
We also note that in his petition for mandamus Mathis seeks a dismissal of
the prosecutions for lack of a speedy trial. “[A] defendant seeking to compel a
dismissal of an indictment on speedy trial grounds has an adequate remedy at law”
through an appeal in the event of a conviction. Smith v. Gohmert, 962 S.W.2d 590,
593 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (orig. proceeding).
We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on December 20, 2022 Opinion Delivered December 21, 2022 Do Not Publish
Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eric Jorell Mathis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-jorell-mathis-texapp-2022.