in Re Eric Jorell Mathis

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 21, 2022
Docket09-22-00401-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Eric Jorell Mathis (in Re Eric Jorell Mathis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Eric Jorell Mathis, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

__________________

NO. 09-22-00401-CR __________________

IN RE ERIC JORELL MATHIS

__________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding 258th District Court of Polk County, Texas Trial Cause Nos. CR21-0380 and CR22-0158 __________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

In a petition for a writ of mandamus, Eric Jorell Mathis seeks to compel the

trial court to dismiss two indictments with prejudice. We deny mandamus relief.

Mathis says that on July 26, 2022, he mailed a pro se application for a writ of

habeas corpus seeking bail reduction and a pro se motion to dismiss he sent to the

district clerk. Mathis complains that the trial court judge refused to read the motions

when Mathis brought the motions to the attention of the trial court in a hearing on

October 6, 2022. The scheduling orders Mathis attached to the mandamus record

indicate that Mathis was represented by counsel on that date and that the trial court

set the cases for trial beginning December 5, 2022. Criminal defendants are generally

1 not entitled to hybrid representation and a “trial court is free to disregard any pro se

motions presented by a defendant who is represented by counsel.” Robinson v. State,

240 S.W.3d 919, 922 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007).

We also note that in his petition for mandamus Mathis seeks a dismissal of

the prosecutions for lack of a speedy trial. “[A] defendant seeking to compel a

dismissal of an indictment on speedy trial grounds has an adequate remedy at law”

through an appeal in the event of a conviction. Smith v. Gohmert, 962 S.W.2d 590,

593 (Tex. Crim. App. 1998) (orig. proceeding).

We deny the petition for a writ of mandamus.

PETITION DENIED.

PER CURIAM

Submitted on December 20, 2022 Opinion Delivered December 21, 2022 Do Not Publish

Before Golemon, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Gohmert
962 S.W.2d 590 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Robinson v. State
240 S.W.3d 919 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Eric Jorell Mathis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-jorell-mathis-texapp-2022.