in Re: Eric Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 30, 2019·No. 08-19-00103-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

§ No. 08-19-00103-CR IN RE § ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ERIC FLORES, § ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF RELATOR.

§ MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator, Eric Flores, has filed a petition for writ of mandamus against the Honorable Maria Salas-Mendoza, Judge of the 120th District Court of El Paso County, Texas. Relator asks the Court to order Respondent to enter a default judgment against the State on Relator’s Article 11.07 application for writ of habeas corpus filed in trial court cause number 20110D01621-120-9. The petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two requirements. The relator must establishes (1) that he has no adequate remedy at law to redress his alleged harm, and (2) that what he seeks to compel is a ministerial act, not a discretionary or judicial decision. In re Allen, 462 S.W.3d 47, 49 (Tex.Crim.App. 2015). The Court of Criminal Appeals has exclusive jurisdiction to grant relief in a post-conviction habeas corpus proceeding where there is a final felony conviction. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fifth District, 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex.Crim.App. 2013). We do not have jurisdiction to order the trial court to grant habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

April 30, 2019 YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ. (Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Eric Flores, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re: Eric Flores (in Re: Eric Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th District
392 S.W.3d 115 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2013)
In re Allen
462 S.W.3d 47 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2015)