in Re: Eric Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2009·No. 08-09-00043-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS





IN RE: ERIC FLORES,

Relator.

§
§
§
§
§

§



No. 08-09-00043-CR

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING



IN MANDAMUS



MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Eric Flores, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Maria Salas-Mendoza, Judge of the 120th Judicial District Court to "be ministerially compelled to allow the relator and his next appointed attorney to instruct the jury to answer a questionnaire of contentions dictating the jurors' involvement in the case to extenuate political activity during jury trial."

In order to obtain relief through a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other adequate remedy at law is available; and (2) that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals At Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion. State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001). Based on the petition and record provided, Mr. Flores has not demonstrated he is entitled to mandamus relief. See Tex.R.App.P. 52.8. We therefore deny relator's request.



February 20, 2009

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice



Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.



(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Eric Flores, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

in Re: Eric Flores (in Re: Eric Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at Texarkana
236 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)