in Re: Eric Flores

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 12, 2009·No. 08-09-00265-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS

§

§ IN RE: ERIC FLORES, No. 08-09-00265-CR § Relator. AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING § IN MANDAMUS §

MEMORANDUM OPINION ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS

Relator, Eric Flores, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable David Guaderrama,

Judge of the 243rd Judicial District Court, to discontinue “advancing the private interest of a person

named [omitted] to convey the impression that he is in a special position to frivol- [sic] frivolously

portray to be an assistant district attorney for the purpose of prosecuting [Relator] without due

process of law.”

In order to obtain relief through a writ of mandamus, a relator must establish: (1) no other

adequate remedy at law is available and (2) that the act he seeks to compel is ministerial. State ex

rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Appeals At Texarkana, 236 S.W.3d 207, 210

(Tex.Crim.App. 2007). An act is ministerial if it does not involve the exercise of any discretion.

State ex rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District, 34 S.W.3d 924, 927 (Tex.Crim.App.

2001). Based on the petition and record provided, Mr. Flores has not demonstrated he is entitled to

mandamus relief. See TEX .R.APP .P. 52.8. We therefore deny relator’s request. November 12, 2009 ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re: Eric Flores, (Tex. Ct. App. 2009).

in Re: Eric Flores (in Re: Eric Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Hill v. Court of Appeals for the Fifth District
34 S.W.3d 924 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
State ex rel. Young v. Sixth Judicial District Court of Appeals at Texarkana
236 S.W.3d 207 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2007)