In re Eric F.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Eric F.

187 A.D.2d 1037, 592 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14113

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 18, 1992·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record reveals that Family Court properly considered all reasonable dispositional alternatives (see, Family Ct Act § 754) and that respondent’s placement was "the least restrictive custodial disposition consistent with the child’s requirements for treatment and/or supervision” (Matter of Sandra XX., 169 AD2d 992, 993-994; see also, Matter of Peter VV., 169 AD2d 995, 996). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J. — Person In Need of Supervision.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record reveals that Family Court properly considered all reasonable dispositional alternatives (see, Family Ct Act § 754) and that respondent’s placement was "the least restrictive custodial disposition consistent with the child’s requirements for treatment and/or supervision” (Matter of Sandra XX., 169 AD2d 992, 993-994; see also, Matter of Peter VV., 169 AD2d 995, 996). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Family Court, Townsend, J. — Person In Need of Supervision.) Present — Denman, P. J., Callahan, Boomer, Balio and Davis, JJ.

In re Eric F., 187 A.D.2d 1037, 592 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

187 A.D.2d 1037 (In re Eric F.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related