in Re Eric Dale Angelo
This text of in Re Eric Dale Angelo (in Re Eric Dale Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-11-00338-CR
IN RE ERIC DALE ANGELO
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Eric Dale Angelo, a prison inmate, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the
Honorable F.B. (Bob) McGregor, Jr., Judge of the 66th Judicial District Court, to rule on
Angelo’s third motion for a free copy of the clerk’s and reporters’ records. According to
Angelo’s petition, the trial court has twice previously denied similar motions: once on
February 19, 2010 and once on January 27, 2011.
There are procedural problems with this petition including, but not limited to,
that the petition was not served on the respondent or the real party in interest, TEX. R.
APP. P. 9.5; 52.2. However, we use Rule 2 to look past this and other deficiencies and
dispose of Angelo’s petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Angelo has twice asked the trial court for a free record and has twice been
denied. A third motion is likely to be denied as well. 1 We hold that, based on the facts
of this case, the trial court is not required to repeatedly rule on the same motion. See In
re Birdwell, 224 S.W.3d 864, 869-870 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig. proceeding) (Gray,
C.J., concurring); In re Bannister, 216 S.W.3d 555 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig.
proceeding) (Gray, C.J., concurring). Accordingly, Angelo’s petition for writ of
mandamus is denied.
TOM GRAY Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2011 Do not publish [OT06]
1A defendant is not entitled to a free copy of the record after exhausting the direct appeal in the absence of a specific, compelling reason. See In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Eubanks v. Mullin, 909 S.W.2d 574, 576-77 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, orig. proceeding).
In re Angelo Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Eric Dale Angelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-dale-angelo-texapp-2011.