in Re Eric Dale Angelo

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 21, 2011
Docket10-11-00338-CR
StatusPublished

This text of in Re Eric Dale Angelo (in Re Eric Dale Angelo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re Eric Dale Angelo, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-11-00338-CR

IN RE ERIC DALE ANGELO

Original Proceeding

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Eric Dale Angelo, a prison inmate, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the

Honorable F.B. (Bob) McGregor, Jr., Judge of the 66th Judicial District Court, to rule on

Angelo’s third motion for a free copy of the clerk’s and reporters’ records. According to

Angelo’s petition, the trial court has twice previously denied similar motions: once on

February 19, 2010 and once on January 27, 2011.

There are procedural problems with this petition including, but not limited to,

that the petition was not served on the respondent or the real party in interest, TEX. R.

APP. P. 9.5; 52.2. However, we use Rule 2 to look past this and other deficiencies and

dispose of Angelo’s petition. TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Angelo has twice asked the trial court for a free record and has twice been

denied. A third motion is likely to be denied as well. 1 We hold that, based on the facts

of this case, the trial court is not required to repeatedly rule on the same motion. See In

re Birdwell, 224 S.W.3d 864, 869-870 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig. proceeding) (Gray,

C.J., concurring); In re Bannister, 216 S.W.3d 555 (Tex. App.—Waco 2007, orig.

proceeding) (Gray, C.J., concurring). Accordingly, Angelo’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

TOM GRAY Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Petition denied Opinion delivered and filed September 21, 2011 Do not publish [OT06]

1A defendant is not entitled to a free copy of the record after exhausting the direct appeal in the absence of a specific, compelling reason. See In re Strickhausen, 994 S.W.2d 936, 937 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1999, orig. proceeding); In re Coronado, 980 S.W.2d 691, 693 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1998, orig. proceeding); Eubanks v. Mullin, 909 S.W.2d 574, 576-77 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1995, orig. proceeding).

In re Angelo Page 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Birdwell
224 S.W.3d 864 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)
In Re Coronado
980 S.W.2d 691 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1998)
Eubanks v. Mullin
909 S.W.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995)
In Re Strickhausen
994 S.W.2d 936 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)
In re Bannister
216 S.W.3d 555 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re Eric Dale Angelo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-dale-angelo-texapp-2011.