Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/In re Eric D.

In re Eric D.

162 A.D.2d 1051
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 22, 1990
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 162 A.D.2d 1051 (In re Eric D.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Eric D., 162 A.D.2d 1051 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Appeal unanimously dismissed without costs. Memorandum: No appeal lies from an original order that has been super-ceded by an amended order (10 Carmody-Wait 2d, NY Prac § 70:28; Gorfinkel v First Natl. Bank, 19 AD2d 903, 904, affd 15 NY2d 711; Kurtis v Allstate Ins. Co., 43 AD2d 954, 955; Centino v Isbrandtsen Co., 13 AD2d 977, revd on other grounds 11 NY2d 690, cert denied sub nom. Universal Term. & Stevedoring Corp. v Isbrandtsen Co., 370 US 912). (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J.—surrender of guardianship and custody.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Centino v. Isbrandtsen Co.
180 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 1962)
Gorfinkel v. First National Bank
204 N.E.2d 497 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Centino v. Isbrandtsen Co.
13 A.D.2d 977 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Gorfinkel v. First National Bank
19 A.D.2d 903 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1963)
Kurtis v. Allstate Insurance
43 A.D.2d 954 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)
Universal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp. v. Isbrandtsen Co.
370 U.S. 912 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 A.D.2d 1051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eric-d-nyappdiv-1990.