In re Epstein

856 A.2d 753, 181 N.J. 305, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1048
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 15, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 856 A.2d 753 (In re Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Epstein, 856 A.2d 753, 181 N.J. 305, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1048 (N.J. 2004).

Opinion

ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 04-061, recommending that CHARLES S. EPSTEIN of EDISON, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1985, be disbarred for violations of RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving deceit, dishonesty and misrepresentation), and the principles of In re Siegel, 133 N.J. 162, 627 A.2d 156 (1993);

And CHARLES S. EPSTEIN having been ordered to show cause why he should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHARLES S. EPSTEIN be disbarred, effective immediately, and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that CHARLES S. EPSTEIN be and hereby is permanently restrained and enjoined from practicing law; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent comply with Rule 1:20-20 dealing with disbarred attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that all funds, if any, currently existing in any New Jersey financial institution maintained by CHARLES S. EPSTEIN pursuant to Rule 1:21-6 shall be restrained from disbursement except on application to this Court for good cause shown and shall be transferred by the financial institution to the Clerk of the Superior Court, who is directed to deposit the funds in the Superior Court Trust Fund pending further Order of this Court; and it is further

[306]*306ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent’s file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Imo Scott P. Sigman, an Attorney at Law (074489)
Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014
In re Sigman
104 A.3d 230 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
856 A.2d 753, 181 N.J. 305, 2004 N.J. LEXIS 1048, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-epstein-nj-2004.