In Re Epi Products Usa, Inc., Debtor. O'Brien Industries, Inc. v. James A. Dumas, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee
This text of 82 F.3d 422 (In Re Epi Products Usa, Inc., Debtor. O'Brien Industries, Inc. v. James A. Dumas, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
82 F.3d 422
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
In re EPI PRODUCTS USA, INC., Debtor.
O'BRIEN INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellant,
v.
James A. DUMAS, Jr., Chapter 7 Trustee, Appellee.
No. 95-55141.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted March 26, 1996.*
Decided April 1, 1996.
Before: GOODWIN, WIGGINS, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
In light of this court's recent opinions in Mosier v. Kroger Company (In re IRFM, Inc.), 65 F.3d 778 (9th Cir.1995), pet. for cert. filed, 64 U.S.L.W. 3604 (Feb. 26, 1996), and John Mitchell, Inc. v. Steinbrugge (In re Hanna), 72 F.3d 114 (9th Cir.1995), we reverse and remand for further proceedings before the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4. Appellee's motion to strike appellant's reply brief is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 F.3d 422, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 21675, 1996 WL 154504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-epi-products-usa-inc-debtor-obrien-industries-inc-v-james-a-ca9-1996.