in Re: Enserca Engineering, LLC
This text of in Re: Enserca Engineering, LLC (in Re: Enserca Engineering, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DENY; and Opinion Filed July 14, 2017.
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-17-00812-CV
IN RE ENSERCA ENGINEERING, LLC, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 429th Judicial District Court Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 429-03624-2015
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Lang-Miers, and Brown Opinion by Justice Lang-Miers Before the Court is relator’s July 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which relator
complains of the trial court’s denial of counsel’s motion to withdraw as counsel. To be entitled
to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion
and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,
135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has
not shown it is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of
mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the court determines
relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Elizabeth Lang-Miers/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE
170812F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Enserca Engineering, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-enserca-engineering-llc-texapp-2017.