In re Enoch Vincent's Estate

78 A. 714, 84 Vt. 89, 1911 Vt. LEXIS 247
Supreme Court of Vermont·Decided January 4, 1911·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Watson, J.

This case is here on the appeal of Hiram L. [90]*90Sparrow, executor of the last will and testament of Enoch H. Vincent, deceased, from the decree of the probate court, by which the estate of the testator is ordered to be distributed. Theappellees moved to dismiss the appeal, for that the appellant-has no such interest in said decree as entitles him to appeal therefrom.

The petition for the appeal shows the appellant’s relation, to the estate to be that of an executor, simply. This relation neither gives him any legal right, nor places him under any-legal liability, which may be enlarged or diminished by the decree-of distribution. It follows that he has no such interest as is necessary by statute to the right of appeal (P. S. 2973), and the-motion to dismiss should have been granted. Hemenway v. Corey, 16 Vt. 225; In re Clark’s Estate, 79 Vt. 62, 64 Atl. 331, 118 Am. St. Rep. 938.

Decree overruling the motion to dismiss the appeal reversed,. and the appeal dismissed with costs to the appellees. To be certified to the probate court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Enoch Vincent's Estate, 78 A. 714, 84 Vt. 89, 1911 Vt. LEXIS 247 (Vt. 1911).

78 A. 714 (In re Enoch Vincent's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re: Estate of Farwell W. Perry
Vermont Superior Court, 2010
In Re Estate of Gaskell
181 A.2d 67 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1962)
Cardin v. Apple
92 P.2d 32 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1939)
Iverson v. Johnson
260 N.W. 205 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
In Re Estate of Nelson
260 N.W. 205 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1935)
Lyons, Exrx. v. Field, Trustee
175 A. 11 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1934)
Woodbine Savings Bank v. Yager
245 N.W. 917 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1932)
Estate of Bailey v. Cullen
238 N.W. 845 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1931)
Estate of Sullivan v. Sullivan
229 N.W. 65 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1930)
Flory v. Flory's Estate
127 A. 369 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1925)
Simonds v. Simonds' Estate
117 A. 103 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1922)
Tucker v. Seargeant
199 P. 765 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)
Peck's Administrator v. Peck's Administrator
99 A. 635 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1917)