In re Engelhardt

Supreme Court of New Jersey

In re Engelhardt

192 A.3d 1023, 235 N.J. 85

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided August 17, 2018·No. M-1639 Sept. Term 2017; 081677·Published

Opinion

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice law filed by SUZANNE L. ENGELHARDT of BLOOMINGDALE , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 1:20-17 (e) (1), effective April 25, 2014, by Order filed March 26, 2014;

**86And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs and interest owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SUZANNE L. ENGELHARDT be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This matter having been duly presented on the motion for reinstatement to practice law filed by SUZANNE L. ENGELHARDT of BLOOMINGDALE , who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1991, and who was temporarily suspended from the practice of law pursuant to Rule 1:20-17 (e) (1), effective April 25, 2014, by Order filed March 26, 2014;

**86And the Disciplinary Review Board having reported to the Court that respondent has paid the outstanding administrative costs and interest owed;

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SUZANNE L. ENGELHARDT be restored to the practice of law, effective immediately.

In re Engelhardt, 192 A.3d 1023, 235 N.J. 85 (N.J. 2018).

Pincite

192 A.3d 1023 (In re Engelhardt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.