In re Engel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Engel

241 A.D. 100, 272 N.Y.S. 696, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1934

StatusPublished

This text of 241 A.D. 100 (In re Engel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Engel, 241 A.D. 100, 272 N.Y.S. 696, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated and certain extenuating circumstances noted in the report of the learned referee, including the fact that respondent has refrained from practicing his profession since the filing of the charges in this proceeding, to wit, for upwards of one year, we deem a censure sufficient.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

For the reasons stated and certain extenuating circumstances noted in the report of the learned referee, including the fact that respondent has refrained from practicing his profession since the filing of the charges in this proceeding, to wit, for upwards of one year, we deem a censure sufficient.

Present — Finch, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Untermyer, JJ.

Respondent censured.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

241 A.D. 100, 272 N.Y.S. 696, 1934 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-engel-nyappdiv-1934.