In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Peh

701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3335
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 12, 1998
Docket98-2208
StatusPublished

This text of 701 N.E.2d 701 (In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Peh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Peh, 701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3335 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court on a motion for an order to show cause filed by movant, Ohio State Bar Association. On November 9, 1998, respondent, Tony Peh, filed a response to the motion for order to show cause which was due November 2,1998. Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s response to the motion for order to show cause be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-enforcement-of-subpoena-duces-tecum-directed-to-peh-ohio-1998.