In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Custodian of Records, Wallaby's, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Custodian of Records, Wallaby's, Inc.

701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3334

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 12, 1998

Docket98-2207

StatusPublished

This text of 701 N.E.2d 701 (In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Custodian of Records, Wallaby's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Enforcement of Subpoena Duces Tecum Directed to Custodian of Records, Wallaby's, Inc., 701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3334 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

This cause is pending before the court on a motion for an order to show cause filed by movant, Ohio State Bar Association. On November 9,1998, respondent, Custodian of Records, Wallaby’s, Inc., filed a response to the motion for order to show cause which was due November 2, 1998. Whereas S.Ct-Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s response to the motion for order to show cause be, and hereby is stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This cause is pending before the court on a motion for an order to show cause filed by movant, Ohio State Bar Association. On November 9,1998, respondent, Custodian of Records, Wallaby’s, Inc., filed a response to the motion for order to show cause which was due November 2, 1998. Whereas S.Ct-Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits the filing of a document after the filing deadline has passed,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that respondent’s response to the motion for order to show cause be, and hereby is stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 N.E.2d 701, 84 Ohio St. 3d 1401, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 3334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-enforcement-of-subpoena-duces-tecum-directed-to-custodian-of-records-ohio-1998.