In re Empire Construction & Supply Co.

166 F. 1019, 92 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided January 12, 1909·No. No. 115·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Abbe, is the owner of two buildings in Brooklyn. On May 16, 1908, be brought an action in the state court to recover damages against the trustee of the bankrupt for alleged trespass upon his property. On June 22, 1908, the bankruptcy court on petition of the trustee issued an injunction restraining the further prosecution of the action in the [1020] state court. Abbe duly filed a petition to revise this order. The principles of law governing the case at bar have been several times before this court and need not be again discussed. In re Russell & Birkett, 101 Fed. 248, 41 C. C. A. 323; Matter of Kanter, 121 Fed. 984, 58 C. C. A. 260; Matter of Spitzer, 130 Fed. 879, 66 C. C. A. 35; Matter of Mertens, 147 Fed. 182, 77 C. C. A. 478; Matter of De Kalb & Berger (filed Nov. 18, 1908) 165 Fed. 895. The order is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Empire Construction & Supply Co., 166 F. 1019, 92 C.C.A. 666, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 4314 (2d Cir. 1909).

166 F. 1019 (In re Empire Construction & Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Vass v. Conron Bros. Co.
59 F.2d 969 (Second Circuit, 1932)
In re Tomlinson
193 F. 101 (E.D. New York, 1912)
In re Spechler Bros.
185 F. 311 (E.D. New York, 1911)