In re Emison

8 F. Cas. 666, 1 Chi. Leg. News 342, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 595, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 325
District Court, D. Kentucky·Decided May 10, 1869·No. Case No. 4,459·Published

Opinion

BALLARD, District Judge.

I concur with the register. If the creditor wishes to withdraw the instrument proven, he may do so in pursuance to the provisions of the twenty-fourth section of the bankrupt act [of 1S67 (14 Stat 528)], but the proof cannot be withdrawn at all. Doubtless it may be waived, but it cannot be withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Emison, 8 F. Cas. 666, 1 Chi. Leg. News 342, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 595, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 325 (kyd 1869).

8 F. Cas. 666 (In re Emison) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.