In re Emison

8 F. Cas. 666, 1 Chi. Leg. News 342, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 595, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 325
CourtDistrict Court, D. Kentucky
DecidedMay 10, 1869
DocketCase No. 4,459
StatusPublished

This text of 8 F. Cas. 666 (In re Emison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Emison, 8 F. Cas. 666, 1 Chi. Leg. News 342, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 595, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 325 (kyd 1869).

Opinion

BALLARD, District Judge.

I concur with the register. If the creditor wishes to withdraw the instrument proven, he may do so in pursuance to the provisions of the twenty-fourth section of the bankrupt act [of 1S67 (14 Stat 528)], but the proof cannot be withdrawn at all. Doubtless it may be waived, but it cannot be withdrawn.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F. Cas. 666, 1 Chi. Leg. News 342, 2 Nat. Bank. Reg. 595, 1869 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-emison-kyd-1869.