in Re: Emily Anne Davis
This text of in Re: Emily Anne Davis (in Re: Emily Anne Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Original Mandamus Proceeding
Before Grant, Ross, and Bass,* JJ.
*Bill Bass, Justice, Retired, Sitting by Assignment
PER CURIAM
Emily Anne Davis has filed a petition for writ of mandamus in which she complained about an order by the trial court which severed her cause of action against Dennis Waters individually and d/b/a Waters Investigation Agency from her divorce proceedings. The trial court entered an order on July 29, 2002, that reconsidered the order of severance and set it aside, recombining the two causes of action into a single proceeding. The relief sought by relator has thus been provided by the trial court. We therefore need not address the issues raised in relator's petition, because the petition is now moot.
Our temporary stay is lifted. We overrule the petition for writ of mandamus as moot.
BY THE COURT
Date Submitted: September 20, 2002
Date Decided: September 23, 2002
Do Not Publish
d="true" DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99" LatentStyleCount="267">
|
|
In The
Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana
______________________________
No. 06-11-00010-CV
IN THE MATTER OF THE MARRIAGE OF
BARBARA (ANN WALDRUP) MORGAN,
AND SHAWN GREGORY MORGAN
On Appeal from the County Court at Law
Hopkins County, Texas
Trial Court No. CV39918
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.
Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Shawn Gregory Morgan, appellant, filed his notice of appeal January 18, 2011.
The clerks record was filed February 10, 2011, and the reporters record was filed April 19, 2011. Morgans brief was therefore due May 19, 2011. Morgan has requested five extensions of time to file the brief. This Court granted the last extension to October 6, but warned Morgan that if a brief was not received by that date, the appeal will be subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Counsel called this Court last week and informed us that he was sending yet another request for extension. That extension has not been received. Pursuant to Rule 42.3(b), we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice
Date Submitted: October 27, 2011
Date Decided: October 28, 2011
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Emily Anne Davis, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-emily-anne-davis-texapp-2002.