In re E.M.D.Y.
This text of In re E.M.D.Y. (In re E.M.D.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
2022-NCSC-126
No. 279A21
Filed 16 December 2022
IN THE MATTER OF E.M.D.Y.
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from an unpublished decision of a
divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 278 N.C. App. 604, 2021-NCCOA-365,
remanding an order entered on 15 May 2020 by Judge Pat Evans in District Court,
Durham County. On 21 July 2022, this Court allowed the motion of respondent in In
re J.R., 2022-NCSC-127, to consolidate these cases for oral argument. Heard in the
Supreme Court on 20 September 2022.
Glenn Gerding, Appellate Defender, by Jillian C. Katz, Assistant Appellate Defender, for respondent-appellant.
Joshua H. Stein, Attorney General, by South A. Moore, General Counsel Fellow, and James W. Doggett, Deputy Solicitor General, for the State.
Disability Rights North Carlina, by Lisa Grafstein, Holly Stiles, and Elizabeth Myerholtz for Disability Rights North Carolina, National Association of Social Workers, Promise Resource Network, and Peer Voice North Carolina, amicus curiae.
PER CURIAM.
¶1 For the reasons stated in In re J.R., 2022-NCSC-127, the decision of the Court
of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Justices HUDSON, MORGAN, and EARLS dissent for the reasons stated in IN RE E.M.D.Y.
Opinion of the Court
Justice Earls’ dissenting opinion in In re J.R., 2022-NCSC-127.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In re E.M.D.Y., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-emdy-nc-2022.