in Re Elmore J. Hardaway
This text of in Re Elmore J. Hardaway (in Re Elmore J. Hardaway) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Phil Hardberger, Chief Justice
Catherine Stone, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: January 5, 2000
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
The court has considered relator's petition for writ of mandamus and is of the opinion that relator is not entitled to the relief sought. See In re Arroyo, 988 S.W.2d 737 (1998) (mandamus relief not appropriate because court of appeals can and should require the preparation and filing of the record necessary to review an order sustaining a contest to an affidavit of indigence within an appeal or proceeding pending in court of appeals where an affidavit of indigency is properly filed with the notice of appeal or within the original proceeding in accordance with rule 20(c) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure). Relator's petition for writ of mandamus is denied. Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).
DO NOT PUBLISH
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Elmore J. Hardaway, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elmore-j-hardaway-texapp-2000.