In re Ellis

D.C. Circuit

In re Ellis

8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedDecember 7, 1925

DocketPatent Appeal No. 1772

StatusPublished

This text of 8 F.2d 1014 (In re Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Ellis, 8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing the claims of appellant’s application for a patent on confectionery material composed in part of hydrogenated oil.

Each of the several tribunals of the Patent Office has fully and satisfactorily answered appellant’s contentions. An examination of the record convinces us of the correctness of the conclusion reached by the Office, and, since we can add nothing to what has been said there, we affirm the decision without further discussion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from a decision of the Patent Office refusing the claims of appellant’s application for a patent on confectionery material composed in part of hydrogenated oil.

Each of the several tribunals of the Patent Office has fully and satisfactorily answered appellant’s contentions. An examination of the record convinces us of the correctness of the conclusion reached by the Office, and, since we can add nothing to what has been said there, we affirm the decision without further discussion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ellis-cadc-1925.