In re Ellis

109 F. App'x 649
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 5, 2004
DocketNo. 04-7049
StatusPublished

This text of 109 F. App'x 649 (In re Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ellis, 109 F. App'x 649 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Scott Ellis brought this mandamus action seeking an evidentiary hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion pending in the district court. Ellis has failed to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief and that there are no other adequate means for obtaining the relief. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.
449 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
109 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ellis-ca4-2004.