In re Ellis
This text of 109 F. App'x 649 (In re Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Robert Scott Ellis brought this mandamus action seeking an evidentiary hearing on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion pending in the district court. Ellis has failed to demonstrate that he has a clear and indisputable right to mandamus relief and that there are no other adequate means for obtaining the relief. Allied Chem. Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc., 449 U.S. 33, 35, 101 S.Ct. 188, 66 L.Ed.2d 193 (1980). Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 F. App'x 649, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ellis-ca4-2004.