in Re Elizabeth Smith
This text of in Re Elizabeth Smith (in Re Elizabeth Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont _________________ NO. 09-16-00102-CV _________________
IN RE ELIZABETH SMITH
________________________________________________________________________
Original Proceeding 172nd District Court of Jefferson County, Texas Trial Cause No. E-197802 ________________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Elizabeth Smith, Relator, filed a petition for a writ of mandamus seeking
relief from the trial court’s order requiring her claims to be arbitrated. See Tex. R.
App. P. 52.1. In her petition, Relator contends the trial court abused its discretion
by compelling arbitration of her claim for legal malpractice based on a provision in
a legal services agreement providing for arbitration. Smith asks this Court to
compel the trial court to withdraw its order compelling arbitration. After reviewing
the petition for writ of mandamus and the mandamus record that accompanied the
petition, we conclude that Smith has not shown that she is entitled to mandamus
1 relief. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004)
(orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839-40 (Tex. 1992). We
deny the petition seeking mandamus relief. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8.
PETITION DENIED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on April 20, 2016 Opinion Delivered April 21, 2016
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Elizabeth Smith, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elizabeth-smith-texapp-2016.