In re Elizabeth C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Elizabeth C.

122 A.D.2d 621, 505 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59908

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 11, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D.2d 621 (In re Elizabeth C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Elizabeth C., 122 A.D.2d 621, 505 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that presently and for the foreseeable future respondent has and will continue to suffer from a mental illness which makes her unable to provide adequate care for her child (Matter of Nereida S., 57 NY2d 636, 640, rearg denied 57 NY2d 775). Contrary to respondent’s [622]*622assertion, we find the psychological testimony offered by witnesses for petitioner to be clear, consistent, unequivocal and conclusive as to respondent’s mental illness and ability to parent her child, and she offered no proof to controvert this testimony. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Willis, J. — termination of parental rights.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner established by clear and convincing evidence that presently and for the foreseeable future respondent has and will continue to suffer from a mental illness which makes her unable to provide adequate care for her child (Matter of Nereida S., 57 NY2d 636, 640, rearg denied 57 NY2d 775). Contrary to respondent’s [622]*622assertion, we find the psychological testimony offered by witnesses for petitioner to be clear, consistent, unequivocal and conclusive as to respondent’s mental illness and ability to parent her child, and she offered no proof to controvert this testimony. (Appeal from order of Monroe County Family Court, Willis, J. — termination of parental rights.) Present— Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Balio, Lawton and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D.2d 621, 505 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 59908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elizabeth-c-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack