in Re Elizabeth Benavidez Elite Aviation, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided May 15, 2019·No. 04-19-00283-CV·Published

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00283-CV

IN RE ELIZABETH BENAVIDEZ ELITE AVIATION, INC.

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 15, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

In this original proceeding, relator asks this court to compel the trial court to grant its no-

evidence motion for summary judgment, which it filed on March 4, 2019. We deny the petition

for writ of mandamus.

DISCUSSION

Upon the filing of a no-evidence motion for summary judgment, “[t]he court must grant

the motion unless the respondent produces summary judgment evidence raising a genuine issue of

material fact.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 166a(i). Because the real party in interest did not respond to

relator’s no-evidence motion for summary judgment, relator asserts the trial court had no discretion

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017CVK002669-D3, styled Laredo Jet Center, LLC v. City of Laredo, et al., pending in the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas, the Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo presiding. 04-19-00283-CV

to refuse to grant its motion, and this court has the authority to issue a writ directing the trial court

to grant the motion.

Although Rule 166a(i) plainly states that the motion “must” be granted absent a proper

response, we do not have the authority by mandamus to require the trial court to grant relator’s

pending motion. Crofts v. Court of Civil Appeals, 362 S.W.2d 101, 104-05 (Tex. 1962) (orig.

proceeding) (appellate court “may not tell the district court what judgment to enter”); In re Mission

Consol. Indep. Sch. Dist., 990 S.W.2d 459, 460 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 1999, orig.

proceeding) (“we do not have the authority by mandamus . . . to require the trial court to grant the

present ‘no evidence’ motion for summary judgment”). Therefore, we deny relator’s petition for

writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

in Re Elizabeth Benavidez Elite Aviation, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

in Re Elizabeth Benavidez Elite Aviation, Inc. (in Re Elizabeth Benavidez Elite Aviation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Mission Consolidated Independent School District
990 S.W.2d 459 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1999)