In re Elizabeth Arielle L.
This text of 26 A.D.3d 190 (In re Elizabeth Arielle L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Family Court, New York County (Jody Adams, J.), entered March 22, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from, determined that respondent father’s consent to adoption was not required, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The evidence established that respondent father failed to provide consistent financial support for his daughter and did not maintain “substantial and continuous or repeated contact with the child” within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 111 (1) (d) (see Matter of Maxamillian, 6 AD3d 349, 351 [2004]).
We have considered and rejected said respondent’s remaining contentions. Concur—Buckley, P.J., Marlow, Sweeny, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 A.D.3d 190, 807 N.Y.S.2d 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elizabeth-arielle-l-nyappdiv-2006.