in Re Elio Enay Rudamas
This text of in Re Elio Enay Rudamas (in Re Elio Enay Rudamas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas December 23, 2021
IN RE ELIO ENAY RUDAMAS,
ORDER
No 04-21-00578-CR
Original Proceeding1
Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
On December 22, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. This court believes a serious question concerning the mandamus relief sought requires further consideration. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than ten (10) days from the date of this order. Any such response must conform to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 52.4. A motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus is unnecessary; therefore, the relator’s motion for leave is DENIED as moot.
It is so ORDERED on this 23rd day of December, 2021.
PER CURIAM
ATTESTED TO: ______________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 11304-CR, styled State of Texas v. Elio Enay Rudamas, pending in the County Court, Kinney County, Texas. The challenged letter ruling was signed by the Honorable Tully Shahan.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Elio Enay Rudamas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elio-enay-rudamas-texapp-2021.