In re Elijah McN.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Elijah McN.

304 A.D.2d 450, 757 N.Y.S.2d 724, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 22, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 304 A.D.2d 450 (In re Elijah McN.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Elijah McN., 304 A.D.2d 450, 757 N.Y.S.2d 724, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about February 4, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree (three counts), and placed him on probation for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The court properly weighed conflicting testimony and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Harold Lynch, J.), entered on or about February 4, 2002, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of sexual abuse in the second degree (three counts), and placed him on probation for a period of one year, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The court properly weighed conflicting testimony and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations. Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

304 A.D.2d 450, 757 N.Y.S.2d 724, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-elijah-mcn-nyappdiv-2003.