In Re Eliason
This text of 32 A. 166 (In Re Eliason) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
At the time of the service of the writ of arrest on the petitioner in the action for deceit, the action of assumpsit against the petitioner was pending in the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, having been continued to enable the petitioner, when he should have been released from imprisonment in that suit, to appear as a *118 witness in the trial of it. This being so, the petitioner was within the State for the purpose of attending the trial of the action of assumpsit, and was, therefore, not liable to arrest in another suit. Ellis v. DeGarmo, 17 R. I. 715 ; Waterman v. Merritt, 7 R. I. 345.
Petition granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 A. 166, 19 R.I. 117, 1895 R.I. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-eliason-ri-1895.